Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rectification u/s 254(2) - failure to take cognizance of certain judicial pronouncements - non-consideration of the judgments of the jurisdictional High Court and the Tribunal, which were specifically relied upon by the counsel during the course of the hearing of the appeal constitutes a mistake apparent from record - rectification allowable
Rectification u/s 254(2) - failure to take cognizance of certain judicial pronouncements - non-consideration of the judgments of the jurisdictional High Court and the Tribunal, which were specifically relied upon by the counsel during the course of the hearing of the appeal constitutes a mistake apparent from record - rectification allowable
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
