Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty u/s 271 (1)(c) - TP adjustment - TPO included Government Companies which are now cannot be treated as good comparable as per certain decisions - if these will be excluded, Arithmetic mean is approximate to the working of the assessee hence it is not a case of concealment of income or furnishing of the inaccurate particulars - assessee has acted in good faith and with due diligence so no penalty is leviable
Penalty u/s 271 (1)(c) - TP adjustment - TPO included Government Companies which are now cannot be treated as good comparable as per certain decisions - if these will be excluded, Arithmetic mean is approximate to the working of the assessee hence it is not a case of concealment of income or furnishing of the inaccurate particulars - assessee has acted in good faith and with due diligence so no penalty is leviable
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.