Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Fictitious loss by way of Client Code Modification (CCM) - unexplained expenditure - The transactions of were duly supported by bills/contract notes and also confirm by parties whose name appear in the data that the transactions are belonging to them only and there is nothing on record establishes any collusion/connivance of the assessee with the share broker - losses allowable
Fictitious loss by way of Client Code Modification (CCM) - unexplained expenditure - The transactions of were duly supported by bills/contract notes and also confirm by parties whose name appear in the data that the transactions are belonging to them only and there is nothing on record establishes any collusion/connivance of the assessee with the share broker - losses allowable
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.