Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Merger of order passed u/s 254(2) with main order of Tribunal - set off of brought forward losses and unabsorbed depreciation - the order passed in the miscellaneous petition stood merged with the earlier order and the composite order being questioned before the Court and the challenge at the instance of the revenue having been rejected then appeal against main order is not maintainable
Merger of order passed u/s 254(2) with main order of Tribunal - set off of brought forward losses and unabsorbed depreciation - the order passed in the miscellaneous petition stood merged with the earlier order and the composite order being questioned before the Court and the challenge at the instance of the revenue having been rejected then appeal against main order is not maintainable
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.