Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Penalty u/s 78 of FA - there was a confusion at the field level for proper classification of activity undertaken by the appellant as to whether it is under ‘Business Auxiliary Service’ or under ‘Business Support Service’ and there have been multiplicity of interpretation - appellant had also deposited the entire amount of ST demanded under the SCN with interest before issuance of SCN - imposition of penalty u/s 78 is not warranted
Penalty u/s 78 of FA - there was a confusion at the field level for proper classification of activity undertaken by the appellant as to whether it is under ‘Business Auxiliary Service’ or under ‘Business Support Service’ and there have been multiplicity of interpretation - appellant had also deposited the entire amount of ST demanded under the SCN with interest before issuance of SCN - imposition of penalty u/s 78 is not warranted
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
