Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Penalty u/s 78 of FA - there was a confusion at the field level for proper classification of activity undertaken by the appellant as to whether it is under ‘Business Auxiliary Service’ or under ‘Business Support Service’ and there have been multiplicity of interpretation - appellant had also deposited the entire amount of ST demanded under the SCN with interest before issuance of SCN - imposition of penalty u/s 78 is not warranted
Penalty u/s 78 of FA - there was a confusion at the field level for proper classification of activity undertaken by the appellant as to whether it is under ‘Business Auxiliary Service’ or under ‘Business Support Service’ and there have been multiplicity of interpretation - appellant had also deposited the entire amount of ST demanded under the SCN with interest before issuance of SCN - imposition of penalty u/s 78 is not warranted
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
