Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - wrong claim of TDS which not belong to the assessee but appeared in the form No.26AS - there was no addition made to the income of the assessee of any kind whatsoever qua this TDS claim - the provisions of section 271(1)(c) do not apply to the present case as there was neither concealment of income nor furnishing of inaccurate particulars
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - wrong claim of TDS which not belong to the assessee but appeared in the form No.26AS - there was no addition made to the income of the assessee of any kind whatsoever qua this TDS claim - the provisions of section 271(1)(c) do not apply to the present case as there was neither concealment of income nor furnishing of inaccurate particulars
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.