Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - wrong claim of TDS which not belong to the assessee but appeared in the form No.26AS - there was no addition made to the income of the assessee of any kind whatsoever qua this TDS claim - the provisions of section 271(1)(c) do not apply to the present case as there was neither concealment of income nor furnishing of inaccurate particulars
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - wrong claim of TDS which not belong to the assessee but appeared in the form No.26AS - there was no addition made to the income of the assessee of any kind whatsoever qua this TDS claim - the provisions of section 271(1)(c) do not apply to the present case as there was neither concealment of income nor furnishing of inaccurate particulars
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.