Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - wrong facts in reasons recorded - AO completely ignored the fact that the return was already filed on 18.01.2010 and vide letter dated 24.02.2012 the assessee has explained that he is a regular assessee and produced the copy of Income-tax return filed - assumption of jurisdiction by the AO is bad in law
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - wrong facts in reasons recorded - AO completely ignored the fact that the return was already filed on 18.01.2010 and vide letter dated 24.02.2012 the assessee has explained that he is a regular assessee and produced the copy of Income-tax return filed - assumption of jurisdiction by the AO is bad in law
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.