Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Revision u/s 263 - disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - CIT has not correctly interpreted the provisions of sec.194C(2) nor consider the law amended in sec.40(a)(ia) held to be applicable retrospectively - CIT also failed to verify and conduct the minimal enquiry about non-deduction of TDS and deposit of TDS before the due date for filing the return of income - Revision order set aside.
Revision u/s 263 - disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - CIT has not correctly interpreted the provisions of sec.194C(2) nor consider the law amended in sec.40(a)(ia) held to be applicable retrospectively - CIT also failed to verify and conduct the minimal enquiry about non-deduction of TDS and deposit of TDS before the due date for filing the return of income - Revision order set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.