Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Mis-declaration of import goods - woven fabric - at the instance of the appellant goods were put to test for ascertainment of its description and classification before clearance - there is nothing on record that the samples drawn by DRI Officials were the representative samples of the consignment cleared in the disputed Bill of entry except the statement of Shri Rajbir Singh whose veracity is not tested through cross-examination - no additional duty/penalty
Mis-declaration of import goods - woven fabric - at the instance of the appellant goods were put to test for ascertainment of its description and classification before clearance - there is nothing on record that the samples drawn by DRI Officials were the representative samples of the consignment cleared in the disputed Bill of entry except the statement of Shri Rajbir Singh whose veracity is not tested through cross-examination - no additional duty/penalty
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.