Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Condonation of delay - against two order for penalty U/s. 271AAA and u/s 271(l)(c) joint one appeal was filed - subsequently after decision of CIT(A) separate appeal was filed - no undue advantage has been derived by the assessee by filing the appeal late and no vested right of the Revenue can be said to have been disturbed in case the delay is condoned - the mistake at best can be said to be a technical mistake which stands corrected
Condonation of delay - against two order for penalty U/s. 271AAA and u/s 271(l)(c) joint one appeal was filed - subsequently after decision of CIT(A) separate appeal was filed - no undue advantage has been derived by the assessee by filing the appeal late and no vested right of the Revenue can be said to have been disturbed in case the delay is condoned - the mistake at best can be said to be a technical mistake which stands corrected
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.