Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Condonation of delay - against two order for penalty U/s. 271AAA and u/s 271(l)(c) joint one appeal was filed - subsequently after decision of CIT(A) separate appeal was filed - no undue advantage has been derived by the assessee by filing the appeal late and no vested right of the Revenue can be said to have been disturbed in case the delay is condoned - the mistake at best can be said to be a technical mistake which stands corrected
Condonation of delay - against two order for penalty U/s. 271AAA and u/s 271(l)(c) joint one appeal was filed - subsequently after decision of CIT(A) separate appeal was filed - no undue advantage has been derived by the assessee by filing the appeal late and no vested right of the Revenue can be said to have been disturbed in case the delay is condoned - the mistake at best can be said to be a technical mistake which stands corrected
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.