Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - genuineness of the claim has neither been disputed by the department nor the claimed expenses are false - the assessee has furnished all the relevant facts concerning the claim made by it in the return filed and disallowance u/s.40(a) was made for the reasons that assessee failed to deduct TDS thereon - no penalty
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - genuineness of the claim has neither been disputed by the department nor the claimed expenses are false - the assessee has furnished all the relevant facts concerning the claim made by it in the return filed and disallowance u/s.40(a) was made for the reasons that assessee failed to deduct TDS thereon - no penalty
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
