Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Stay of demand - recovery notice during the pendency of the stay applications - Instruction No.1914 dated 02.12.1993 of the Board would make it clear that the stay petition filed with the AO must be disposed of within two weeks of the filing of petition by the taxpayer - recovery notice is obviously contrary to the Instructions and the Office Memorandum issued by the Board - calls for interference by this Court
Stay of demand - recovery notice during the pendency of the stay applications - Instruction No.1914 dated 02.12.1993 of the Board would make it clear that the stay petition filed with the AO must be disposed of within two weeks of the filing of petition by the taxpayer - recovery notice is obviously contrary to the Instructions and the Office Memorandum issued by the Board - calls for interference by this Court
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.