Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Revision u/s 263 - notice issued on several points - assessee could not rebut the findings of the Ld. PCIT in respect of points ‘b’ and ‘c’ which proves that the order of the AO was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue as the AO had failed to make any proper required enquires to frame the assessment - revision upheld
Revision u/s 263 - notice issued on several points - assessee could not rebut the findings of the Ld. PCIT in respect of points ‘b’ and ‘c’ which proves that the order of the AO was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue as the AO had failed to make any proper required enquires to frame the assessment - revision upheld
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.