Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Penalty u/s 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 - violation of the conditions of the Advance Authorisation Licence - appellant, being an employee, only accepted directorship of the two companies under instructions of his employer, and was not personally involved - penalty reduced from ₹ 25 lakh to ₹ 50,000/-
Penalty u/s 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 - violation of the conditions of the Advance Authorisation Licence - appellant, being an employee, only accepted directorship of the two companies under instructions of his employer, and was not personally involved - penalty reduced from ₹ 25 lakh to ₹ 50,000/-
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.