Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Since the assessee had furnished full particulars about the expenditure incurred including non–deduction of TDS in the tax audit report itself, it cannot be accused of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - failure to disallow the amount u/s 40(a)(ia) was due to a bona fide mistake is acceptable - penalty deleted
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Since the assessee had furnished full particulars about the expenditure incurred including non–deduction of TDS in the tax audit report itself, it cannot be accused of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - failure to disallow the amount u/s 40(a)(ia) was due to a bona fide mistake is acceptable - penalty deleted
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
