Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - advance written off - business or capital loss - genuineness of loss is not in dispute - in the assessment order there is no mention about furnishing of inaccurate particulars and simply made disallowed - in penalty order AO has not specified which particular furnished by the assessee was incorrect, erroneous or false - no penalty
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - advance written off - business or capital loss - genuineness of loss is not in dispute - in the assessment order there is no mention about furnishing of inaccurate particulars and simply made disallowed - in penalty order AO has not specified which particular furnished by the assessee was incorrect, erroneous or false - no penalty
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.