Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - advance written off - business or capital loss - genuineness of loss is not in dispute - in the assessment order there is no mention about furnishing of inaccurate particulars and simply made disallowed - in penalty order AO has not specified which particular furnished by the assessee was incorrect, erroneous or false - no penalty
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - advance written off - business or capital loss - genuineness of loss is not in dispute - in the assessment order there is no mention about furnishing of inaccurate particulars and simply made disallowed - in penalty order AO has not specified which particular furnished by the assessee was incorrect, erroneous or false - no penalty
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.