Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Offences punishable under Penal Code OR UPGST Act - mensrea - Section 135 of the U.P.Act provide that in any prosecution for an offence, which requires a cuplable mental state on the part of the accused, the court shall presume the existence of such mental state - the standard of proof would have to be higher to prove commission of an offence punishable under the Penal Code than the U.P. Act - quashing of FIR rejected
Offences punishable under Penal Code OR UPGST Act - mensrea - Section 135 of the U.P.Act provide that in any prosecution for an offence, which requires a cuplable mental state on the part of the accused, the court shall presume the existence of such mental state - the standard of proof would have to be higher to prove commission of an offence punishable under the Penal Code than the U.P. Act - quashing of FIR rejected
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.