Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Offences punishable under Penal Code OR UPGST Act - mensrea - Section 135 of the U.P.Act provide that in any prosecution for an offence, which requires a cuplable mental state on the part of the accused, the court shall presume the existence of such mental state - the standard of proof would have to be higher to prove commission of an offence punishable under the Penal Code than the U.P. Act - quashing of FIR rejected
Offences punishable under Penal Code OR UPGST Act - mensrea - Section 135 of the U.P.Act provide that in any prosecution for an offence, which requires a cuplable mental state on the part of the accused, the court shall presume the existence of such mental state - the standard of proof would have to be higher to prove commission of an offence punishable under the Penal Code than the U.P. Act - quashing of FIR rejected
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.