Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Offences punishable under Penal Code OR UPGST Act - mensrea - Section 135 of the U.P.Act provide that in any prosecution for an offence, which requires a cuplable mental state on the part of the accused, the court shall presume the existence of such mental state - the standard of proof would have to be higher to prove commission of an offence punishable under the Penal Code than the U.P. Act - quashing of FIR rejected
Offences punishable under Penal Code OR UPGST Act - mensrea - Section 135 of the U.P.Act provide that in any prosecution for an offence, which requires a cuplable mental state on the part of the accused, the court shall presume the existence of such mental state - the standard of proof would have to be higher to prove commission of an offence punishable under the Penal Code than the U.P. Act - quashing of FIR rejected
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.