Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Offences punishable under two or more enactments - Penal Code/CGST Act/ UPGST Act(UP Act) - there is no provision in the U.P. Act which may suggest that the provisions of the U.P. Act overrides or expressly or impliedly repeals the provisions of the Penal Code or bar in the U.P. Act on lodging an FIR under the Code - contention that proceeding could only be drawn against him under the UP GST Act, is liable to be rejected
Offences punishable under two or more enactments - Penal Code/CGST Act/ UPGST Act(UP Act) - there is no provision in the U.P. Act which may suggest that the provisions of the U.P. Act overrides or expressly or impliedly repeals the provisions of the Penal Code or bar in the U.P. Act on lodging an FIR under the Code - contention that proceeding could only be drawn against him under the UP GST Act, is liable to be rejected
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.