Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - claim of depreciation at 10% is under the bonafide belief that the residential quarters were utilized for the hospital purpose and formed part and parcel of hospital premises - mere making of a bonafide claim would not amount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income - no penalty - no substantial question of law arises
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - claim of depreciation at 10% is under the bonafide belief that the residential quarters were utilized for the hospital purpose and formed part and parcel of hospital premises - mere making of a bonafide claim would not amount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income - no penalty - no substantial question of law arises
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.