Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Justification of CIT(A) assuming jurisdiction u/s.264 - No infirmity into the order passed by CIT as is evident from the records that AO has not applied his mind whether clause (f) of the Explanation 1 of Section 115JB was applicable or not - AT
Justification of CIT(A) assuming jurisdiction u/s.264 - No infirmity into the order passed by CIT as is evident from the records that AO has not applied his mind whether clause (f) of the Explanation 1 of Section 115JB was applicable or not - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.