Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee disclosed all the true facts relating to the land - it may be a good case for making addition since there was difference between the actual consideration and the stamp duty value - but not a good case where penalty u/s 271(1)(c) may be levied as It is well settled that the penalty proceedings are different and distinct from the assessment proceedings
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee disclosed all the true facts relating to the land - it may be a good case for making addition since there was difference between the actual consideration and the stamp duty value - but not a good case where penalty u/s 271(1)(c) may be levied as It is well settled that the penalty proceedings are different and distinct from the assessment proceedings
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
