Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee disclosed all the true facts relating to the land - it may be a good case for making addition since there was difference between the actual consideration and the stamp duty value - but not a good case where penalty u/s 271(1)(c) may be levied as It is well settled that the penalty proceedings are different and distinct from the assessment proceedings
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee disclosed all the true facts relating to the land - it may be a good case for making addition since there was difference between the actual consideration and the stamp duty value - but not a good case where penalty u/s 271(1)(c) may be levied as It is well settled that the penalty proceedings are different and distinct from the assessment proceedings
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
