Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee disclosed all the true facts relating to the land - it may be a good case for making addition since there was difference between the actual consideration and the stamp duty value - but not a good case where penalty u/s 271(1)(c) may be levied as It is well settled that the penalty proceedings are different and distinct from the assessment proceedings
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee disclosed all the true facts relating to the land - it may be a good case for making addition since there was difference between the actual consideration and the stamp duty value - but not a good case where penalty u/s 271(1)(c) may be levied as It is well settled that the penalty proceedings are different and distinct from the assessment proceedings
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
