Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Reassessment u/s 147 - Cash deposition in his saving bank account - The argument that the whole of deposits cannot be regarded as income and therefore the assumption of jurisdiction is vitiated under law is not correct - so long as there is an element of income which has escaped taxation and which exceeds the maximum amount which is not chargeable to tax, the same is sufficient enough to uphold the jurisdiction u/s 147
Reassessment u/s 147 - Cash deposition in his saving bank account - The argument that the whole of deposits cannot be regarded as income and therefore the assumption of jurisdiction is vitiated under law is not correct - so long as there is an element of income which has escaped taxation and which exceeds the maximum amount which is not chargeable to tax, the same is sufficient enough to uphold the jurisdiction u/s 147
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.