Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Revision u/s 263 - Ld. CIT without pointing out any infirmity in the reply /explanation of the assessee could not concluded that the assessment order passed by the AO was found to be ‘erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue’ - explanation-2(a) to section 263 does not authorize or give unfettered powers to the Commissioner to revise each and every order
Revision u/s 263 - Ld. CIT without pointing out any infirmity in the reply /explanation of the assessee could not concluded that the assessment order passed by the AO was found to be ‘erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue’ - explanation-2(a) to section 263 does not authorize or give unfettered powers to the Commissioner to revise each and every order
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.