Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Revision u/s 263 - Ld. CIT without pointing out any infirmity in the reply /explanation of the assessee could not concluded that the assessment order passed by the AO was found to be ‘erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue’ - explanation-2(a) to section 263 does not authorize or give unfettered powers to the Commissioner to revise each and every order
Revision u/s 263 - Ld. CIT without pointing out any infirmity in the reply /explanation of the assessee could not concluded that the assessment order passed by the AO was found to be ‘erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue’ - explanation-2(a) to section 263 does not authorize or give unfettered powers to the Commissioner to revise each and every order
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.