Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Revision u/s 263 - AO made detailed inquiries regarding claim of LTCG before accepting the same - it was incumbent upon Pr.CIT to make inquiry so as to reach the conclusion that the order of the AO was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue - invocation of revision u/s 263 was wrong
Revision u/s 263 - AO made detailed inquiries regarding claim of LTCG before accepting the same - it was incumbent upon Pr.CIT to make inquiry so as to reach the conclusion that the order of the AO was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue - invocation of revision u/s 263 was wrong
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.