Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - quantum addition upheld up to High Court - SLP admitted - Evidences and arguments placed by assessee shows that claim was made disclosing the complete facts in its return of income putting notes in the computation of total income, corroborating it with its balance sheet, supporting it with judicial precedents - mere rejection of the claim of the assessee cannot be invited with the penalty
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - quantum addition upheld up to High Court - SLP admitted - Evidences and arguments placed by assessee shows that claim was made disclosing the complete facts in its return of income putting notes in the computation of total income, corroborating it with its balance sheet, supporting it with judicial precedents - mere rejection of the claim of the assessee cannot be invited with the penalty
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
