Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - quantum addition upheld up to High Court - SLP admitted - Evidences and arguments placed by assessee shows that claim was made disclosing the complete facts in its return of income putting notes in the computation of total income, corroborating it with its balance sheet, supporting it with judicial precedents - mere rejection of the claim of the assessee cannot be invited with the penalty
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - quantum addition upheld up to High Court - SLP admitted - Evidences and arguments placed by assessee shows that claim was made disclosing the complete facts in its return of income putting notes in the computation of total income, corroborating it with its balance sheet, supporting it with judicial precedents - mere rejection of the claim of the assessee cannot be invited with the penalty
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
