Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Quantum additions upheld by all the appellate authorities - in absence of cogent incriminating material to show that the assessee had infact furnished inaccurate particulars of income or had concealed its particulars of income, penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is not leviable
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Quantum additions upheld by all the appellate authorities - in absence of cogent incriminating material to show that the assessee had infact furnished inaccurate particulars of income or had concealed its particulars of income, penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is not leviable
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
