Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defraud by making false depreciation claim - The burden of proving the guilty animus on the part of the assessee is on the Revenue, like on Prosecution in criminal cases and no such negative burden could be cast upon by the assessee himself.
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - defraud by making false depreciation claim - The burden of proving the guilty animus on the part of the assessee is on the Revenue, like on Prosecution in criminal cases and no such negative burden could be cast upon by the assessee himself.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
