Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Insolvency and BankruptcyMarch 19, 2019Case LawsTri
Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process - to discourage IRP from spending the initial expenses from his or her own pocket, it is fair and just to direct the Applicant/Operational Creditor to deposit ₹ 2,00,000/- (Two lakhs) for the initial expenses to be spent by the IRP.
Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process - to discourage IRP from spending the initial expenses from his or her own pocket, it is fair and just to direct the Applicant/Operational Creditor to deposit ₹ 2,00,000/- (Two lakhs) for the initial expenses to be spent by the IRP.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.