Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Rectification of mistake u/s 254(2) - mistake of making an incorrect statement by AR - Order of tribunal was passed relying statement - argument advanced by said counsel are to be construed to have been made on behalf of assessee and shall bind the assessee - not a mistake warranting rectification u/s 254(2)
Rectification of mistake u/s 254(2) - mistake of making an incorrect statement by AR - Order of tribunal was passed relying statement - argument advanced by said counsel are to be construed to have been made on behalf of assessee and shall bind the assessee - not a mistake warranting rectification u/s 254(2)
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.