Charitable institution cannot lose exemption merely because some activities incidentally benefit a religious community; retrospective registration can...
The claim of the appellant (Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti) that the allotment of shop or land to the traders cannot be considered as “renting of immovable property” is not tenable.
The claim of the appellant (Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti) that the allotment of shop or land to the traders cannot be considered as “renting of immovable property” is not tenable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.