Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4401 to 4420 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Justification for the expenditure - amount paid towards secondment of employees - The contention of the AO that, real beneficiary of the Australian entity’s employees was not the JV but the AE, rejected. - Revenue is not permitted to hold salary payment reimbursed to AE is a non deductible expenditure.
Justification for the expenditure - amount paid towards secondment of employees - The contention of the AO that, real beneficiary of the Australian entity’s employees was not the JV but the AE, rejected. - Revenue is not permitted to hold salary payment reimbursed to AE is a non deductible expenditure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.