Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Detention of goods - mistake had crept in, in the mentioning of the lorry number as TN 19 U 7857 instead of TN 19 U 7873 - It is incumbent upon the statutory authority/the Proper Officer to have made mention of the contravention in the field provided in the impugned order for such purpose. This has not been done - The present order of detention cannot be sustained and the same is quashed.
Detention of goods - mistake had crept in, in the mentioning of the lorry number as TN 19 U 7857 instead of TN 19 U 7873 - It is incumbent upon the statutory authority/the Proper Officer to have made mention of the contravention in the field provided in the impugned order for such purpose. This has not been done - The present order of detention cannot be sustained and the same is quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.