Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty u/s. 271D - From which date counting of limitation start - Reference of matter by AO or notice by Joint CIT - Though the contention of the Revenue seems to be plausible. - However, being the sub-ordinate tribunal, we are bound to follow the decision of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court.
Penalty u/s. 271D - From which date counting of limitation start - Reference of matter by AO or notice by Joint CIT - Though the contention of the Revenue seems to be plausible. - However, being the sub-ordinate tribunal, we are bound to follow the decision of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.