Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Objective characteristics govern magnesium bis-glycinate chelate classification as an amino-acid coordination compound, not a food preparation or anti...
Independent professional certification requires pleaded knowledge or complicity for criminal liability; untimely complaints remain barred by limitatio...
Rectification of mistake - ITAT has allows appeal on merit & dismissed the assessee’s cross objections as infructuous regarding re-opening of assessment. Assesse not challenged that order. After reversal of appeal by High court on merit assesse filed rectification application before Tribunal. High Court held that rectification application filed by the assessee was barred by the principle of finality, and to an extent the doctrine of merger. High Court further held that this is not apparent mistake or error warranting rectification.
Rectification of mistake - ITAT has allows appeal on merit & dismissed the assessee’s cross objections as infructuous regarding re-opening of assessment. Assesse not challenged that order. After reversal of appeal by High court on merit assesse filed rectification application before Tribunal. High Court held that rectification application filed by the assessee was barred by the principle of finality, and to an extent the doctrine of merger. High Court further held that this is not apparent mistake or error warranting rectification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.