Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Assessment u/s 153A - TAT remanded the back relying upon the decision in Lancy’s case [2016 (2) TMI 797 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] - The appeal was dismissed, as being bereft of any substantial question of law. Therefore, the judgment reported in Lancy’s case cannot be said to be applicable in law or that it is binding for any reason whatsoever.
Assessment u/s 153A - TAT remanded the back relying upon the decision in Lancy’s case [2016 (2) TMI 797 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] - The appeal was dismissed, as being bereft of any substantial question of law. Therefore, the judgment reported in Lancy’s case cannot be said to be applicable in law or that it is binding for any reason whatsoever.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.