Habeas corpus challenge to arrest safeguards remains maintainable, but substantial compliance with reasons-to-believe requirement defeats the petition...
Assessment u/s 153A - TAT remanded the back relying upon the decision in Lancy’s case [2016 (2) TMI 797 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] - The appeal was dismissed, as being bereft of any substantial question of law. Therefore, the judgment reported in Lancy’s case cannot be said to be applicable in law or that it is binding for any reason whatsoever.
Assessment u/s 153A - TAT remanded the back relying upon the decision in Lancy’s case [2016 (2) TMI 797 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] - The appeal was dismissed, as being bereft of any substantial question of law. Therefore, the judgment reported in Lancy’s case cannot be said to be applicable in law or that it is binding for any reason whatsoever.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.