Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
The income tax department cannot presume something to have happened five years ago just because in the assessment year 1997-98 the assessee failed to explain its source of fund u/s 68 and cash fund u/s 269SS. It did not mean that it indulged in similar activity in the previous year 1992-93.
The income tax department cannot presume something to have happened five years ago just because in the assessment year 1997-98 the assessee failed to explain its source of fund u/s 68 and cash fund u/s 269SS. It did not mean that it indulged in similar activity in the previous year 1992-93.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.