Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
ITAT observed that, we are unable to accept the observations of the lower authorities, that the provisions of Sec. 43B would not be applicable as regards the employees contribution to provident fund, and the same would continue to be governed by Sec. 36(1)(va) r.w.s. 2(24)(x) of the Act.
ITAT observed that, we are unable to accept the observations of the lower authorities, that the provisions of Sec. 43B would not be applicable as regards the employees contribution to provident fund, and the same would continue to be governed by Sec. 36(1)(va) r.w.s. 2(24)(x) of the Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.