Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
The allegations of the Department about suppression of facts on part of the appellant with the mention that the mistake came to the notice only at the time of Audit is not sustainable specially in a case where the duty has been paid, however, to a wrong Excise Code.
The allegations of the Department about suppression of facts on part of the appellant with the mention that the mistake came to the notice only at the time of Audit is not sustainable specially in a case where the duty has been paid, however, to a wrong Excise Code.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
