Equivalent value attachment under money laundering law upheld where received funds were treated as proceeds of crime and prior-acquired property could...
Penalty u/r 26 of CER - Rule 26 would apply directly in the case in hand, as appellant is the person who acquired the possession of goods and were concerned with depositing or keeping the fans on which admittedly duty liability was not discharged.
Penalty u/r 26 of CER - Rule 26 would apply directly in the case in hand, as appellant is the person who acquired the possession of goods and were concerned with depositing or keeping the fans on which admittedly duty liability was not discharged.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
